This was one of the questions posed on the day when I asked my congregation to tell me things that puzzled them about their faith.
I'm going to take a specific example: the parable of the great banquet, which in Matthew's version comes in Chapter 22. Here it is:
Jesus spoke to them again in parables, saying: “The kingdom of heaven is like a king who prepared a wedding banquet for his son. He sent his servants to those who had been invited to the banquet to tell them to come, but they refused to come.
“Then he sent some more servants and said, ‘Tell those who have been invited that I have prepared my dinner: My oxen and fattened cattle have been butchered, and everything is ready. Come to the wedding banquet.’
“But they paid no attention and went off—one to his field, another to his business. The rest seized his servants, mistreated them and killed them. The king was enraged. He sent his army and destroyed those murderers and burned their city.
“Then he said to his servants, ‘The wedding banquet is ready, but those I invited did not deserve to come. So go to the street corners and invite to the banquet anyone you find.’ So the servants went out into the streets and gathered all the people they could find, the bad as well as the good, and the wedding hall was filled with guests.
“But when the king came in to see the guests, he noticed a man there who was not wearing wedding clothes. He asked, ‘How did you get in here without wedding clothes, friend?’ The man was speechless.
“Then the king told the attendants, ‘Tie him hand and foot, and throw him outside, into the darkness, where there will be weeping and gnashing of teeth.’
“For many are invited, but few are chosen.”
But one party goer hasn't bothered to dress up, and the king asks how he even got in, without being dressed appropriately. When he has no answer, he is unceremoniously trussed up and tossed out, where there's not much he can do except - in one of Matthew's favourite words - gnash his teeth.
I swear that if Matthew told a fluffy bunny story, he'd put gnashing of teeth in there somewhere. Anyway, how do you gnash your teeth?
Sorry, I digress.
The point is, it sounds pretty mean on the unfortunate guest who'd violated the dress code. For all we know, he might not have owned a tuxedo, or whatever the first century equivalent was. What's going on?
To answer that, we have to understand who the parable was originally aimed at. If we look back at chapter 21, we see that Jesus was in conversation with the chief priests, after having annoyed them no end by pulling the stunt with the donkey and the palm branches.
He was telling them that originally God's invitation had been for them, but they'd made their excuses, so God was throwing the doors open to others. In Luke's version, it's the poor, the crippled, the blind and the lame who are invited. Matthew isn't specific who the new guests are, but the religious leaders would still have been incensed to be told that they weren't going to be at God's party, and others were.
So the first point is, God in this story is passing judgement on those who have rejected his offer. He's slamming the door in their faces, because they've had their chance and they said no.
But what about our badly dressed boy? Well, just because you've been offered a late pass to the best party ever, doesn't mean you can just breeze in without taking it seriously. This is a pretty impressive offer God is making, and we need to appreciate it properly.
Sometimes, we Christians can think that God is such a cuddly grandpa figure, so keen to forgive and overlook any wrong doing, that it doesn't matter how we behave. But he has a little more backbone than that. Even those who think they're on the inside of God's plans need to remember they have responsibilities too.
Interesting views, and I like the point about God not being a grandpa figure! However, I still feel that the God I understand and beleive in wouldn't "slam the door" in the faces of the chief priests and pharases (yes I spelt it wrong) and instead would maybe "leave it ajar" - allowing them the chance to come in if they do change their minds. What do you think?
ReplyDeleteM
I don't disagree. "Slamming the door" wasn't the best phrase in the world - thanks for pointing that out. You're quite right to say that Jesus left it ajar for the religious leaders, and a few shuffled in - Nicodemus for one.
ReplyDeleteOne of the things parables do is to tell a distorted view of the truth, a one sided view of the truth, to force a response from people. I think Jesus told it in the hope that the chief priests would respond by coming back to God. He had the hope that they would not exclude themselves.
But he was mightily angry at the way they used the door themselves - they slammed it in other people's faces, and that no one can deny.
One of the hardest things for us as flawed sinful human beings is to fully appreciate how different God actually is to us.
ReplyDeleteEven though we are created in his image, because of the fall that image is so flawed in us we find it almost impossible to accept we cannot approach him just as we are.
One of the simplest examples I can think of to illustrate this is imagine trying to walk into blazing heat of a furnace - you simply get consumed.
So too with God and his intense holiness compared to our sinfulness. As he said to Moses "no man can see me and live".
David too initally did not appreciate fully the nature of the One he was dealing with. Yet after the follwing incident (2 Samuel Ch6) he had a radical turnaround in his views of God.
6 Again, David gathered together all the chosen men of Israel, thirty thousand.
2 And David arose, and went with all the people that were with him from Baale of Judah, to bring up from thence the ark of God, whose name is called by the name of the Lord of hosts that dwelleth between the cherubims.
3 And they set the ark of God upon a new cart, and brought it out of the house of Abinadab that was in Gibeah: and Uzzah and Ahio, the sons of Abinadab, drave the new cart.
4 And they brought it out of the house of Abinadab which was at Gibeah, accompanying the ark of God: and Ahio went before the ark.
5 And David and all the house of Israel played before the Lord on all manner of instruments made of fir wood, even on harps, and on psalteries, and on timbrels, and on cornets, and on cymbals.
6 And when they came to Nachon's threshingfloor, Uzzah put forth his hand to the ark of God, and took hold of it; for the oxen shook it.
7 And the anger of the Lord was kindled against Uzzah; and God smote him there for his error; and there he died by the ark of God.
8 And David was displeased, because the Lord had made a breach upon Uzzah: and he called the name of the place Perezuzzah to this day.
9 And David was afraid of the Lord that day, and said, How shall the ark of the Lord come to me?
10 So David would not remove the ark of the Lord unto him into the city of David: but David carried it aside into the house of Obededom the Gittite.
11 And the ark of the Lord continued in the house of Obededom the Gittite three months: and the Lord blessed Obededom, and all his household.
12 And it was told king David, saying, The Lord hath blessed the house of Obededom, and all that pertaineth unto him, because of the ark of God. So David went and brought up the ark of God from the house of Obededom into the city of David with gladness.
So, if we really do want to know God more intimately and as a consequence we might decide to ask Him to give us loftier view of him, then we should be careful in asking this and be suer we want to ask this.
The reason being is this......almost inevitably in order for us to see him more clearly he will rock us at our very roots.
A superficial experience of God leads to soft views about God's character in the areas of holiness, judgement and suffering, but after being dealt with by God we begin to see him more clearly for what he really.
I would therefore never encouratge anyone to seek to know God intimately unless they are fully aware they will most likely be shaken to the roots.
I know this is not a comfortable message to receive but it is the only road to holiness and eventual inner peace with Him.
Paul said "I have learned in whatsoever situation therewith to be content"
To get there though to be able to say that he had to suffer !
Well, I can't disagree with your understanding of the holiness of God, but I do feel it's not the whole picture. Surely in Jesus we see an approachable face of God. Philip said to him, "Lord, show us the Father and we will be satisfied." and Jesus replied, "If you have seen me, you have seen the Father."
ReplyDeleteThe writer to the Hebrews said "Our God is a consuming fire." but he also urged us to come close to a God who could be found in a less intimidating way than of old - no longer like the mountain top of Sinai, but now amid the spirits of the just made perfect, thanks to the sprinkled blood of Jesus that speaks better than the blood of Abel.
Seems to me that God's ultimate word to us is not, "I'm holy, and you're not." Instead it's "I'm holy, and you're forgiven."